Medical groups contest Alberta’s gender-affirming care law in court

Wednesday, May 28, 2025, 12:22 pm

Canadian medical associations are legally challenging Alberta’s controversial healthcare legislation that guides gender-affirming treatments for minors. Critics argue the law unduly limits clinical discretion and infringes on patient rights, sparking a debate that blends legal rigor with a hint of incredulous irony over bureaucratic overreach.

Bluesky: @alannasmith.bsky.social, @picardonhealth.bsky.social, @theglobeandmail.com


theglobeandmail.com / Alberta doctors’ group supports CMA’s constitutional challenge of bill limiting access to medical care for trans youth

The CMA contends that Bill 26, which became law last December, violates physicians’ freedom of conscience as guaranteed in Section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms

globalnews.ca / Canadian doctors group challenging constitutionality of Alberta transgender law

The Canadian Medical Association is challenging the constitutionality of Alberta's legislation limiting access to medical treatment for transgender youth.

cbc.ca / Doctors group challenging constitutionality of Alberta transgender law

A group representing Canada's doctors is challenging the constitutionality of Alberta's legislation banning certain gender-affirming treatments for children under the age of 16, arguing it violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience.

citynews.ca / Canadian Medical Association to challenge Alberta gender-affirming healthcare bill in court

Alberta's Bill 26, which directs doctors on how to deliver gender-affirming care to minors in the province, is in the spotlight one again.

thestar.com / Canadian doctors group challenging constitutionality of Alberta transgender law

EDMONTON - A group representing Canada's doctors is challenging the constitutionality of Alberta's legislation limiting access to medical treatment for transgender youth, arguing it violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience.


permalink / 5 stories from sources in 33 hours ago #law #albert #lgbtq #health




More Top Stories...


Ontario MPPs secure 35% salary raise after lengthy freeze

Ontario’s Finance Minister introduced legislation to break a 16-year pay freeze by awarding MPPs a 35% salary increase, aligning their wages more closely with federal counterparts. Despite raised eyebrows over fiscal priorities, the move marks a bold—and somewhat eyebrow-raising—shift in provincial compensation. More...


Legault presses Ottawa for funding of critical power transmission lines

Quebec Premier François Legault is calling on the federal government to provide funding for new power transmission projects aimed at modernizing regional hydroelectric infrastructure. The move highlights ongoing debates about federal responsibility versus provincial needs in supporting essential energy initiatives and development. More...


Former B.C. Minister Decries Bill 15’s Treatment of First Nations

Former B.C. minister Melanie Mark has lambasted the provincial government for pushing Bill 15, accusing officials of ditching First Nations communities and environmental advocates. The outburst comes amid mounting calls for policy reversal in a politically charged atmosphere. More...


Canada Post Labor Dispute Highlights Strike Losses and Tense Talks

Canada Post revealed that striking actions contributed significantly to its reported losses, fueling fresh tensions between the union and management. With negotiations still in flux, both sides are embroiled in a dramatic labor showdown that leaves little room for compromise. More...


Denis Coderre urges Arthabaska voters: Vote for Éric Duhaime now

In a surprising political twist, Denis Coderre has endorsed Éric Duhaime in Arthabaska’s partial election, urging Liberal and federalist voters to reconsider established loyalties. His backing signals a shift in local political dynamics and an appeal for fresh conservative leadership in a closely watched contest. More...



Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the content. Users are encouraged to verify all details independently. We accept no liability for errors, omissions, or any decisions made based on this information.